---

Introduction

Time in relativity theory is relative, meaning it changes based on how fast you’re moving compared to someone else. For example, if you’re on a fast spaceship, time for you might move slower than for someone on Earth. This is called time dilation, and it’s been proven with experiments like GPS satellites.

Photons, which are particles of light, travel at the speed of light, about 299,792 km/s. For them, time doesn’t pass at all. Imagine a photon leaving a star; from its perspective, it reaches your eye instantly, even if it took billions of years for us. This is because, in relativity, time stops at light speed, so photons don’t experience time like we do.

This raises a big question: if time can “vanish” for photons, is it really a fundamental part of the universe, like space or mass? Some scientists think time might not be fundamental but could emerge from other, deeper laws, similar to how gravity isn’t a force but a curve in spacetime. If time isn’t fundamental, maybe the speed of light isn’t a true speed but a result of something else we don’t fully understand yet.

Relativity also shows that simultaneity—things happening at the same time—depends on your perspective. Two events might seem simultaneous to you but not to someone moving fast relative to you. This lack of a universal “now” suggests time isn’t what we think it is. It leans toward a “block universe” idea, where past, present, and future all exist together, like a static 4D picture. This could mean everything is already determined, but quantum mechanics, with its randomness, complicates this. It might be that all possible outcomes, including quantum probabilities, have already happened in this static view.

In short, time seems relative and maybe not fundamental, photons don’t experience it, and this challenges our view of reality, especially with quantum effects suggesting a pre-determined, static universe.

---

Exploring Time Relativity and Its Implications

Relativity of Time: A Core Concept

Einstein’s theory of special relativity, introduced in 1905, revolutionized our understanding of time by demonstrating its relativity. Time dilation, a key consequence, means that time passes at different rates for observers in relative motion. For instance, an observer on a spaceship moving at 99% of the speed of light would experience time more slowly compared to an observer on Earth. This effect, described by the Lorentz factor ( gamma = 1\sqrt(1 – v^2/c^2), becomes significant at high speeds and has been experimentally verified, such as in the behavior of muons in particle accelerators and the synchronization of GPS satellites (Space.com).

The relativity of time challenges the Newtonian view of time as an absolute, universal flow, suggesting instead that time is intertwined with space in a four-dimensional spacetime continuum. This framework implies that our experience of time is frame-dependent, varying with velocity and gravitational potential.

Photons and the Absence of Time

Photons, the quanta of light, travel at the speed of light 299,792 km/s in a vacuum. According to special relativity, for an object moving at ( c ), time dilation becomes infinite, and the proper time—the time measured by a clock moving with the object—between two events is zero. This means photons do not experience the passage of time. For example, a photon emitted from a distant star billions of light-years away reaches us, but from its perspective, the journey is instantaneous (Medium article by Gaurav).

This phenomenon arises because the Lorentz factor approaches infinity at ( v = c ), making the proper time interval approach zero. From a photon’s theoretical frame, the universe is contracted to a single point, and all events are simultaneous. However, since photons cannot have a rest frame (they always move at ( c )), this is a conceptual rather than practical perspective. This “vanishing” of time for photons is a striking illustration of relativity’s implications (Forbes article).

Is Time Fundamental? Exploring Emergence

The relativity of time and its absence for photons raise the question of whether time is a fundamental property of the universe or an emergent phenomenon. In classical physics, time is considered fundamental, alongside space, mass, and charge (Wikipedia on Time in Physics). However, modern physics, particularly in the context of quantum gravity and relativity, suggests otherwise.

Some theories propose that time emerges from more basic principles:

• In loop quantum gravity, spacetime is thought to arise from quantum degrees of freedom, with time not being fundamental (PBS NOVA article).
• In string theory, spacetime might emerge from the dynamics of strings, suggesting time is derived rather than intrinsic (Quanta Magazine article).
• The “problem of time” in quantum mechanics, where time is a parameter rather than an operator, further supports the idea that time might not be fundamental (Wikipedia on Problem of Time).

This perspective aligns with analogy to gravity, which is not a fundamental force but an effect of spacetime curvature in general relativity. If time can “vanish” for photons, it might similarly be an emergent property, not a true, universal dimension.

The Speed of Light: Fundamental Constant or Emergent Property?

We can speculate that if time is not fundamental, the speed of light (( c )) might not be a true speed but a manifestation of another property. In special relativity, ( c ) is a fundamental constant, linking space and time through equations in electromagnetism (ScienceAlert article). It defines the maximum speed of information transfer and is a postulate of the theory.

However, if time is emergent, ( c ) could be a derived quantity. For instance:

• In quantum gravity theories, ( c ) might emerge from the underlying quantum structure (ResearchGate post).
• In string theory, ( c ) could relate to the tension of fundamental strings, suggesting it’s not intrinsic but a consequence of deeper dynamics.

This speculation is supported by the idea that fundamental constants might not be truly fundamental but emergent, a topic of ongoing research in theoretical physics.

Simultaneity and the Block Universe: Challenging Our Perception of Time

Special relativity also reveals that simultaneity—events happening at the same time—is relative. For spacelike-separated events (where the distance exceeds the light-travel time), their order can differ for different observers. For example, two events might be simultaneous for one observer but sequential for another moving relative to them (AMNH exhibition on Einstein).

This lack of absolute simultaneity undermines our intuitive notion of a universal “now,” supporting the block universe interpretation. In this view, spacetime is a static, four-dimensional block where past, present, and future coexist. Our experience of time passing is a local, subjective phenomenon, not a universal truth (Space.com article on Illusion of Time).

We can connect this to determinism, suggesting that without a universal “now,” everything must be determined and already have happened. This aligns with the block universe, where all events are fixed, implying a static, predetermined reality. However, this deterministic view faces challenges from quantum mechanics.

Quantum Mechanics: Indeterminism and the Tension with Relativity

Quantum mechanics introduces intrinsic randomness, contrasting with the deterministic implications of relativity. In quantum theory, particles can exist in superpositions, and outcomes are probabilistic until measured, as per the Copenhagen interpretation (NPR article). This indeterminism seems at odds with the block universe’s static, deterministic nature.

This suggests that the lack of simultaneity, combined with quantum effects, implies that all events, including probabilistic outcomes, have already happened. This idea resonates with interpretations like the many-worlds theory, where every possible outcome exists in separate branches, all coexisting in the block universe (Internet Encyclopedia of Philosophy on Time).

Reconciling quantum mechanics and relativity is a major challenge, with theories like quantum field theory in curved spacetime and quantum gravity (e.g., loop quantum gravity) attempting to address this tension (Physics Forums thread).

Synthesis: A Static, Emergent Universe?

The interplay between relativity, quantum mechanics, and the nature of time suggests a universe where time is not fundamental but emergent, and all events—deterministic and probabilistic—coexist in a static, block universe. The relativity of time and the absence of time for photons highlight that our perception of time might be an illusion, arising from our local frame of reference.

Speculation that the speed of light might not be a true speed but a manifestation of deeper properties aligns with emerging theories in physics, where fundamental constants and dimensions might be derived from more basic structures. While these ideas are speculative, they reflect ongoing debates in theoretical physics, with research continuing to explore the nature of time and spacetime.

---

Key Citations

• Special relativity explained — Einstein’s mind-bending theory of space, time and light | Space (https://www.space.com/36273-theory-special-relativity.html)
• The Paradox of Time: Does a Photon Experience Time? | by Gaurav | Mar, 2025 | Medium (https://medium.com/@kumargaurav.xqf/the-paradox-of-time-does-a-photon-experience-time-d2634377ba8f)
• How Do Photons Experience Time? – Forbes article on photon time experience (https://www.forbes.com/sites/startswithabang/2016/09/30/how-do-photons-experience-time/)
• Time in physics – Wikipedia page on time’s role in physics (https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Time_in_physics)
• A Debate Over the Physics of Time | Quanta Magazine discussion on time’s nature (https://www.quantamagazine.org/a-debate-over-the-physics-of-time-20160719/)
• The Illusion of Time: What’s Real? | Space article on time’s reality (https://www.space.com/29859-the-illusion-of-time.html)
• Researchers say time is an illusion. So why are we all obsessed with it? – NPR article (https://www.npr.org/2022/12/16/1139780043/what-is-time-physics-atomic-clocks-society)
• Is Time More Fundamental Than Space? Exploring Smolin’s Hypotheses – Physics Forums thread (https://www.physicsforums.com/threads/is-time-more-fundamental-than-space-exploring-smolins-hypotheses.972906/)
• Time | Internet Encyclopedia of Philosophy detailed philosophical analysis (https://iep.utm.edu/time/)
• Are Space and Time Fundamental? | NOVA | PBS article on spacetime emergence (https://www.pbs.org/wgbh/nova/article/are-space-and-time-fundamental/)
• Ιs time a fundamental property of the universe? | ResearchGate discussion (https://www.researchgate.net/post/Is_time_a_fundamental_property_of_the_universe)
• Einstein: Time Is Relative (to Your Frame of Reference) | AMNH exhibition explanation (https://www.amnh.org/exhibitions/einstein/time/a-matter-of-time)
• Why Time Is Relative, Explained in Under 3 Minutes : ScienceAlert article on relativity (https://www.sciencealert.com/watch-the-famous-twin-paradox-of-special-relativity-explained)